引用
台灣地區勞力市場分隔之探討：流動表分析
Exploring Taiwan's Labor Market Segmentation: The Analysis of the Mobility Tables
作者：黃毅志（Yih-Jyh Hwang） | 首次發表於 2020-07-14 | 第 25 期 June 2001
DOI：https://dx.doi.org/10.6786/TJS.200106.0157
研究論文（Research Articles）
DOI：https://dx.doi.org/10.6786/TJS.200106.0157
研究論文（Research Articles）
論文資訊 | Article information
摘要 Abstract
本研究根據新結構論的架構，運用1992年「台灣地區社會變遷調查階層組」的資料，以流動表分析，試圖回答下列問題：(1)台灣是否存在界線分明、互相流動程度很低的雙元或多元勞力市場？(2)這些勞力市場彼此如何分隔？研究結果顯示：台灣的勞力市場的確存在著分隔的現象，不同勞力市場之問有明顯的流動障礙，而其主要的界線在於公私部門之間。雖然在以行業爲分界的核心與邊陲經濟部門、老闆與受雇者的階級分界間，也同樣存在著流動障礙，但不若公私部門之間的流動障礙明顯。同時，我們也發現公司規模並未形成勞力市場分隔的基礎，大公司與小公司之間仍存在著許多流動機會。本文在理論上呼應了新結構論的觀點，將勞力市場引入社會階層化研究。相信此研究取向，可對台彎傳統以地位取得模型爲基礎的階層化研究予以補充。
關鍵字：新結構論、勞力市場分隔、公私部門
關鍵字：新結構論、勞力市場分隔、公私部門
Using the 1992 Taiwan Social Change Survey data (stratification section), we confront the following questions from a New Structuralism perspective: (1) In Taiwan, are there clear-cut dual or multiple labor markets with a low inter-sector mobility rate? (2) How and to what extent is the labor market segmented in Taiwan? The empirical results indicate that segmented labor markets do exist in Taiwan, and that the barriers are quite significant. This is especially true between the public and private sectors. Although there are mobility barriers between core and periphery industries, and between employers and employees, these are not as crucial as those between the public and private sectors. Further, we find that the size of a firm does not affect its reflection of Taiwan's labor market segmentation. Workers flow through big and small firms alike. In sum, this paper, which corresponds with the New Structuralism perspective, emphasizes the importance of structural features of the labor market. We believe that this approach should be able to supplement the social stratification research based on the traditional status attainment model in Taiwan.
Keywords: New Structuralism, Labor Market Segmentation, Public and Private Sector
Keywords: New Structuralism, Labor Market Segmentation, Public and Private Sector
